“Today is history” Amon Göth’s limping chiasmus and overcoming of the stylistics

We have tried to open some new and possibly undisclosed vistas on the famous scene in movie Schindler?s List, by Steven Spielberg, probing question: can should Holocaust be represented. To best of my knowledge, speech main antagonist movie, Amon Goeth, ?Today is history?, has not this moment been treated manner, as bearer insightful theories style philosophy. This what we remedy paper. try accomplish broadening conceptual frames classical stylistics coming from structuralism De Saussure, applying Mikhail Bakhtin?s philosophy genre, particular scene. Starting hypothesis, relating gap between Western Russian semioses, was that semiosis, represented Peirce Umberto Eco, would tolerate diegetic script towards biblical levels meaning, which are absent capacities semiosis. assumed subconscious plan director, namely, represent German plan: make only reach proportions, but meaning well, thus immortalize itself. During analysis encountered certain similarities distribution behavior figure asyndeton, attitudes modernity, they Catherine Pickstock?s book After Writing: Liturgical Consummation Philosophy. Together with Bakhtins? work, Pickstocks? analyses served our guiding starting point observation manipulation deigetic text. having discovered aborted patterns stylistic reconfiguration, nazi propaganda unsuccesufully aimed at, order paschal rite de passage through controlling historical necessity, moved toward pictures history, harboured depos Nazi understanding Jews Germans are. found essential contradictions respect Nazis, stemming serious ontological error confusing ancient Roman ancestral history very deformed reduced Judeo-Christian perspectives, possible epistemological interface manouvre into description. Thus, conclude, description possible, it neccessary, just like its counterpart, representation.